A ripe, fresh entry-level Maconnais Burgundy from Waitrose, recommended by Anne Jones
To the south of what is popularly considered to be Burgundy proper, the Maconnais is a source of good, ripe chardies in various styles. This Waitrose White Burgundy is a ripe, fresh, easy drinker.
Golden sandy yellow, aromas of melonskin and ripe orchard fruits.
Sweet, ripe melon, white flowers, freshness, some sweet spice and lime-marmalade zestiness. Some gentle persistence.
Good entry-level example that gives some indication of what the more ambitious wines are all about.
Match this versatile white with fish starters such as salmon mousse, mixed anti-pasti, chicken or monkfish.
£8.49 from Waitrose; provided for review.
Other related articles
Henri Clerc Chassagne-Montrachet Vieilles Vignes 2009 - The Co-op
Laboure-Roi Cote de Beaune-Villages, 2012 - Waitrose
Views on Terroir in Burgundy: Sangouard-Guyot
Links
Waitrose - website, twitter
Friday, 2 May 2014
Saturday, 26 April 2014
1er Cru Clos des Mouches, Domaine Berthelemot, 2009 Beaune - WineTrust100
A classy but modern and easy-drinking Burgundy from WineTrust100
I've fallen in and out of love with red Burgundy more times than I care to remember - I've mostly liked it well enough but often failed to see the point.
This classy textbook Beaune from WineTrust100, however, impressed straight out of the bottle - no diva tantrums here.
Classic farmyardy nose, ripe red fruits, complex oaky spice and a wonderful texture, it is what a really good Burgundy should be. There's everything here - balance, complexity, fruit, texture, precision. And it is very drinkable, too.
Good, complex, textbook Burgundy - and priced accordingly. But if you can, buy a case and watch it develop over the next decade.
Very Good.
Match with lighter game.
£36 from WineTrust100; provided for review.
Other related articles
Wine Trust 100
Dinner with WineTrust 100
Two Red Burgundies from Private Cellar
Laboure-Roi Cote de Beaune-Villages, 2012 - Waitrose
Loeb Burgundy En Primeur 2011
Links
WineTrust100 - website, twitter
I've fallen in and out of love with red Burgundy more times than I care to remember - I've mostly liked it well enough but often failed to see the point.
This classy textbook Beaune from WineTrust100, however, impressed straight out of the bottle - no diva tantrums here.
Classic farmyardy nose, ripe red fruits, complex oaky spice and a wonderful texture, it is what a really good Burgundy should be. There's everything here - balance, complexity, fruit, texture, precision. And it is very drinkable, too.
Good, complex, textbook Burgundy - and priced accordingly. But if you can, buy a case and watch it develop over the next decade.
Very Good.
Match with lighter game.
£36 from WineTrust100; provided for review.
Other related articles
Wine Trust 100
Dinner with WineTrust 100
Two Red Burgundies from Private Cellar
Laboure-Roi Cote de Beaune-Villages, 2012 - Waitrose
Loeb Burgundy En Primeur 2011
Links
WineTrust100 - website, twitter
Friday, 25 April 2014
Bordeaux 2013 reviewed (and not by me)
A review of 2013 Bordeaux by Andrew Gordon, Managing Director of Private Cellar
A Grand Cercle tasting of 2013 Bordeaux en primeur in London a few weeks ago confirmed what I had come to expect of the vintage; it was not an easy year and the difficult, cool conditions favoured the whites and stickies more than the reds, where the gentlest of hands was needed in the cellar.
A few days later, an email from Newmarket-based Private Cellar dropped into my inbox and provided such an excellent assessment of the vintage, with a nuanced, insightful view of its strengths and weaknesses, that I sought, and got, their approval to put out an edited version here.
Private Cellar is offering Bordeaux 2013 en primeur – see their website for more details.
From Andrew Gordon:
The Bordelais have made enormous strides in quality over the last 20 years; Bordeaux is a better drink now than it has ever been.
But has the increase in quality kept pace with the increase in price? In some cases yes, in many cases no.
As ever the clever bit is the detail and with a vintage like 2013 - which the press have damned from the onset of the poor weather roughly a year ago - the detail is mighty well hidden.
But it is there and there is some fun to be had. However, prices must reflect quality and demand.
Should you buy or should you unsubscribe from all offers and pretend that the vintage never happened? That rather depends upon a number of factors including:
- the completeness of your cellars
- your age
- the style of wine you like (many of the best 2013 are almost Burgundian in style)
- whether you enjoy the more recent “high alcohol” style from Bordeaux (2013 is really quite low alcohol
You should probably not buy if:
- your carefully planned wine collection is already jam-packed with little gems that will electrify you over the next 15 years. 2013 will drink early and although it will be fun it probably will have no place in your well-structured cellar
- you love heavy beefy reds that will last forever
- you want to make a financial killing by investing in wine
- you loathe dry and sweet white Bordeaux.
But in amongst the press-led tirade of abuse against 2013 you can find one or two serious journos saying things like “there is a lot to like about 2013”, “…quite a few jewels in 2013”, “...higher acidity and lower alcohol-rather similar to red burgundy”, and “bright punchy red fruits”.
You probably should buy if:
- you have recently started a cellar and it is still relatively devoid of immediate drinkers
- you have any gaps for fresh early drinking wines that will sing long before your 2012s, 2010s and many 2009s
- you like lighter, less alcoholic, less tannic reds
- you are a drinker rather than an investor, and you drink for pleasure rather than to impress
- you love dry and especially sweet whites.
What you should buy is, of course, the clever bit. The vintage was very mixed with interesting wines growing directly next to filthy wines.
Edouard Moueix summed it up perfectly for us by saying that we should think of the winemaking in 2013 as an “infusion” rather than an “extraction”. And as usual he is right. Infusion = interesting wines. Extraction = horrid wines this year.
What next then?
- do not rush into buying but do not wait forever either. This will be a quick campaign but there is stock around
- do read the tasting notes, not just the name of the wine. Tasting is believing in 2013.
Other related articles
Grand Cercle Bordeaux 2013 En Primeur
Private Cellar portfolio tasting
Links
Private cellar - website, twitter, Facebook
Image credits: Private Cellar website
A Grand Cercle tasting of 2013 Bordeaux en primeur in London a few weeks ago confirmed what I had come to expect of the vintage; it was not an easy year and the difficult, cool conditions favoured the whites and stickies more than the reds, where the gentlest of hands was needed in the cellar.
A few days later, an email from Newmarket-based Private Cellar dropped into my inbox and provided such an excellent assessment of the vintage, with a nuanced, insightful view of its strengths and weaknesses, that I sought, and got, their approval to put out an edited version here.
Private Cellar is offering Bordeaux 2013 en primeur – see their website for more details.
From Andrew Gordon:
The Bordelais have made enormous strides in quality over the last 20 years; Bordeaux is a better drink now than it has ever been.
But has the increase in quality kept pace with the increase in price? In some cases yes, in many cases no.
As ever the clever bit is the detail and with a vintage like 2013 - which the press have damned from the onset of the poor weather roughly a year ago - the detail is mighty well hidden.
But it is there and there is some fun to be had. However, prices must reflect quality and demand.
Should you buy or should you unsubscribe from all offers and pretend that the vintage never happened? That rather depends upon a number of factors including:
- the completeness of your cellars
- your age
- the style of wine you like (many of the best 2013 are almost Burgundian in style)
- whether you enjoy the more recent “high alcohol” style from Bordeaux (2013 is really quite low alcohol
You should probably not buy if:
- your carefully planned wine collection is already jam-packed with little gems that will electrify you over the next 15 years. 2013 will drink early and although it will be fun it probably will have no place in your well-structured cellar
- you love heavy beefy reds that will last forever
- you want to make a financial killing by investing in wine
- you loathe dry and sweet white Bordeaux.
But in amongst the press-led tirade of abuse against 2013 you can find one or two serious journos saying things like “there is a lot to like about 2013”, “…quite a few jewels in 2013”, “...higher acidity and lower alcohol-rather similar to red burgundy”, and “bright punchy red fruits”.
You probably should buy if:
- you have recently started a cellar and it is still relatively devoid of immediate drinkers
- you have any gaps for fresh early drinking wines that will sing long before your 2012s, 2010s and many 2009s
- you like lighter, less alcoholic, less tannic reds
- you are a drinker rather than an investor, and you drink for pleasure rather than to impress
- you love dry and especially sweet whites.
What you should buy is, of course, the clever bit. The vintage was very mixed with interesting wines growing directly next to filthy wines.
Edouard Moueix summed it up perfectly for us by saying that we should think of the winemaking in 2013 as an “infusion” rather than an “extraction”. And as usual he is right. Infusion = interesting wines. Extraction = horrid wines this year.
What next then?
- do not rush into buying but do not wait forever either. This will be a quick campaign but there is stock around
- do read the tasting notes, not just the name of the wine. Tasting is believing in 2013.
Other related articles
Grand Cercle Bordeaux 2013 En Primeur
Private Cellar portfolio tasting
Links
Private cellar - website, twitter, Facebook
Image credits: Private Cellar website
Thursday, 24 April 2014
Sandeman Vintage Ports
If digging out a vintage port suggests that some sort of occasion is being marked, digging out 20 would be a sign of something rather special - and if those 20 go back to the middle of the last century, then it is clearly no common-or-garden extraordinary event.
George Sandeman and winemaker Luis Sottomayor were in London for a vertical tasting of Sandeman vintage ports back to 1944, so after the brief introductions I took the opportunity to taste my way through history.
Logistics geeks may be interested to learn that the ports, which throw a heavy sediment, were decanted in Portugal and re-sealed under nitrogen before shipping to London. Due to their rarity, there were just two bottles of each.
Prices range from low three figures for most of the range to £1,243 for the 1944; this is in no way cheap, but a relative bargain compared to, say, a First Growth Bordeaux.
I did not take detailed notes as these were provided in any case, but starting with the oldest, what remains is an impression by decade.
The 1944, a pale orange colour, is unsurprisingly fully ready for drinking now; it is harmonious and mellow, the fresh fruit faded and something closer to an aged sherry character with dried fruits, roasted nuts, iodine and something slightly medicinal.
This wine rather divided opinion, with some finding it tired and faded but others impressive and venerable - a bit like the (late) Queen Mum. I liked it a lot - indeed, it was my wine of the night. With caveats.
George Sandeman and winemaker Luis Sottomayor were in London for a vertical tasting of Sandeman vintage ports back to 1944, so after the brief introductions I took the opportunity to taste my way through history.
Logistics geeks may be interested to learn that the ports, which throw a heavy sediment, were decanted in Portugal and re-sealed under nitrogen before shipping to London. Due to their rarity, there were just two bottles of each.
Prices range from low three figures for most of the range to £1,243 for the 1944; this is in no way cheap, but a relative bargain compared to, say, a First Growth Bordeaux.
I did not take detailed notes as these were provided in any case, but starting with the oldest, what remains is an impression by decade.
The 1944, a pale orange colour, is unsurprisingly fully ready for drinking now; it is harmonious and mellow, the fresh fruit faded and something closer to an aged sherry character with dried fruits, roasted nuts, iodine and something slightly medicinal.
This wine rather divided opinion, with some finding it tired and faded but others impressive and venerable - a bit like the (late) Queen Mum. I liked it a lot - indeed, it was my wine of the night. With caveats.
A vertical tasting of wines provides two perspectives - vintage quality and the effects of age - which it can be hard to separate out; the 2011 vies with the 1944 as the wine of the night, but it is rather an unfair comparison to make between two wines at such different stages in their evolution.
I will be a very old man by the time the 2011 is fully mature - but as one person said to me "a very happy one - and just think of all that anticipation!".
Over a decade younger, the 1955 showed more figgy fruit and would be too young only for those that want a sherry-esque experience.
The vintages from the 1960s, of which there were many (perhaps too many) felt more youthful, with some glycerol plumpness and more than a hint of vermouth - a complex combination of red fruits, cedar and tobacco box, ginger and spicy notes.
Come the 70s and they feel, for the first time, not yet quite fully knitted together. The 80s were - as the 80s were - indeterminate.
But the 90s were perhaps the oddest bunch - like awkward teenagers, they had lost their primary, youthful vigour but not yet gained the hallmarks of maturity. One thing they all had in common was an aroma of dried red bell pepper and rosehip.
In a Médoc, this would be a sign of full maturity, an indication that the wine should be drunk up now and not aged any further, yet these were relative youngsters.
Was it, as with so many youths, just a "phase they were going through" or a result of winemaking techniques, I wondered.
Despite the presence of both qualified and student MWs in the room, as well as wine educators and even the winemaker himself, I was not able to get a definitive answer.
Come the new millennium, all the wines were still dark and primary and it was easier to make comparisons of quality; the 2007 was impressive, the 2011 superlative - dense, concentrated and full of stuffing.
For me, in general, the older wines were the most interesting - a relative newcomer to aged wines, I find they have an elusive harmonious mellowness and complexity that, like jazz, is impossible to describe but instantly recognisable when you find it.
Henry Jeffreys, by contrast, brought up on wines stored well beyond their customary - and often advisable - limits preferred the younger wines.
Henry Jeffreys, by contrast, brought up on wines stored well beyond their customary - and often advisable - limits preferred the younger wines.
Theories on peak beard and the role of personal preference in qualitative assessment come into play here; we both preferred a style of wine that was different to our most-common experience and inevitably allowed personal preferences to colour our critical views.
For me, a comparison of the 1944 with the 2011 is not so much apples vs pears as trains vs tennis courts.
The mystery of the 90s wines aside, what was clear from this vertical tasting is that the development curve of these wines has a very long tail indeed; the differences between the 2011 and the 2000 were much more pronounced than those between the 1955 and the 1944.
The ports are available in glass, bottle and flights from The Sign of The Don.
Other related articles
Other related articles
Wednesday, 23 April 2014
Tour de Belfort 2012
A tasting of Tour de Belfort's latest vintage with winemaker and winery owner Eugene Lismonde at the IPA
I first tried Eugene Lismonde's Tour de Belfort wines a few years ago when I met with daughter Muriel at her home in Cheshire.
As unofficial "Wine Director" at work, I invited Eugene into our offices for an informal tasting of his current vintages.
On this occasion, I was particularly struck by a number of things:
Purity; Eugene has, in his own words, a Dutch obsession with cleanliness, both in the vineyard and the winery; his vineyard is organic and he learnt his winemaking skills from a Swiss consultant.
As a result, the wines have a purity, vibrancy and cleanliness that I have all too rarely encountered.
Deftness; the wines are made with a light touch; gentle pressing under nitrogen for whites and rosés, gentle fine lees stirring, just six months in new oak for the Grands Vins.
The 2012 wines feel really well-balanced and are drinking nicely now; they will surely develop with age, but do not require age to become palatable.
Concentration; although his vines are young (Eugene planted the vineyard from scratch just ten years ago) yields are kept very (uncommercially?) low through strict pruning with only three or four bunches per vine instead of the more usual six to eight.
The 2012 reds are almost opaque in colour - and a youthfully bright purple - and feel densely concentrated.
My detailed tasting notes are below, but what struck me most about all Eugene's wines is that they are wines to drink and enjoy, not points-chasing critic-slayers.
Whilst they have a warm, southern personality with plenty of fruit expression, they are also elegant and understated with relatively low levels of alcohol and in many ways remind me of Swiss wines at their best.
Their very uniqueness is perhaps their biggest challenge; with a mixture of grapes from Burgundy, Bordeaux and the Rhône, plus a white, a rosé and a fizz that are not traditionally produced in the region and a Malbec that is much softer than the traditional black wine of Cahors, it is not easy to pigeon-hole these wines, to liken them to particular traditional styles.
If that makes them more challenging to sell, it also makes them an even better bargain for the consumer, as ultimately, the proof is in the tasting.
Methode Traditionelle Brut light, fresh, easy-drinking fizz. More of a Prosecco alternative than Champagne-alike, and priced accordingly.
Cuvée Classique Blanc 2012 a blend of Sauvignon and Chardonnay with extra body from lees-stirring. Fresh, aromatic and weighty with some gentle persistence on the finish. Good.
Rosé 2013 very pale salmon pink, ripe red fruits, gently rounded palate, well-balanced, really lovely. Good.
Cuvée Classique Rouge 2012 (unoaked CF/Malbec blend) vibrant purple, ripe bramble fruits, freshness, soft, perfectly ripe tannins, long palate and persistence. Good.
Grand Vin Rouge 2012 (6m in new French oak, 100% Malbec) complex spicy nose with dark fruits and liquorice; lovely harmonious palate with added weightiness and complexity from deft oaking. Very Good.
Other related articles
Links
Tuesday, 22 April 2014
Chateau Laroque 2008, Saint-Emilion - Waitrose
A classy, right-bank Bordeaux from Waitrose
On Bordeaux's right bank, the Merlot dominates; the top appellations here include Saint-Emilion and Pomerol.
This Saint-Emilion Grand Cru Classe from Waitrose, recommended by Anne Jones, is a classy wine - albeit priced accordingly.
A deep crimson with no signs of aging yet, there are aromas of red fruits, coffee grounds, leather, tobacco and spice.
Fresh acidity, bramble fruit and dried green herbs, savouriness and fine, well-integrated tannins. Good length with a touch of minerality and some firmness on the finish.
Well-structured, dense and concentrated - and still youthful; it has years ahead of it.
Very Good.
Match with red meat, such as steak or venison.
£26.99 from Waitrose - provided for review.
Other related articles
La Grand Barrail Lamarzelle, St Emilion Grand Cru, 2006 - Sainsbury's
Blanc et Rouge Dinner at The Corinthia Hotel, London
Links
Waitrose wine - website, twitter
On Bordeaux's right bank, the Merlot dominates; the top appellations here include Saint-Emilion and Pomerol.
This Saint-Emilion Grand Cru Classe from Waitrose, recommended by Anne Jones, is a classy wine - albeit priced accordingly.
A deep crimson with no signs of aging yet, there are aromas of red fruits, coffee grounds, leather, tobacco and spice.
Fresh acidity, bramble fruit and dried green herbs, savouriness and fine, well-integrated tannins. Good length with a touch of minerality and some firmness on the finish.
Well-structured, dense and concentrated - and still youthful; it has years ahead of it.
Very Good.
Match with red meat, such as steak or venison.
£26.99 from Waitrose - provided for review.
Other related articles
La Grand Barrail Lamarzelle, St Emilion Grand Cru, 2006 - Sainsbury's
Blanc et Rouge Dinner at The Corinthia Hotel, London
Links
Waitrose wine - website, twitter
Monday, 21 April 2014
Fleurie 2013 - Marks & Spencer
A juicy, floral Beaujolais Cru from Marks & Spencer
Fleurie is one of the ten Beaujolais cru villages whose wines epitomize what Beaujolais is all about; silky, fruity and, yes, rather floral wines.
Vibrant black cherry, mulberry and raspberry fruit, with perfumey violets and a hint of gingery spice.
Fresh, lively and supple palate with lots of juicy fruits. Full of lively, youthful exuberance, a light and easy drinker.
Match with duck or picnic food; also, sip slightly chilled on a summer's day.
Other related articles
Marks & Spencer - Beaujolais nouveau re-booted
40 Years of Wine at Marks & Spencer
Beaujolais and Beyond
Links
Marks & Spencer - website, twitter
Fleurie is one of the ten Beaujolais cru villages whose wines epitomize what Beaujolais is all about; silky, fruity and, yes, rather floral wines.
Vibrant black cherry, mulberry and raspberry fruit, with perfumey violets and a hint of gingery spice.
Fresh, lively and supple palate with lots of juicy fruits. Full of lively, youthful exuberance, a light and easy drinker.
Match with duck or picnic food; also, sip slightly chilled on a summer's day.
Other related articles
Marks & Spencer - Beaujolais nouveau re-booted
40 Years of Wine at Marks & Spencer
Beaujolais and Beyond
Links
Marks & Spencer - website, twitter
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











